Mobile Security &
Eavesdropping
There is an ever growing sense of security and lack of questioning happening
with the increased use of technology. People are much less likely to question
sources and programs when there are so many available. The thought of having
programs and applications so easily accessible is helping to create a
generation of people that are download happy. These technologies have been
around for long enough now that people do not even give a second glance at
filling out surveys, questionnaires, or allowing a file to download in order to
access a website or gain information. It is with this idea that people have
such great power to gain any information they are looking for, but still need
to remember that they have a specific responsibility to themselves to protect
their security and personal information. There is now a major infestation of
malware for cell phones and one of the newest threats of information stealing
has become cell phone spyware.
In
October of 2008, the National Institute of Science and Technology published a
paper on the Guidelines on
Cell Phone and PDA Security. Within this paper, they highlight some of the
major threats presented to cell phone and PDA users. Some of these threats
include malware, eavesdropping, and location tracking services. Each of these
three threats seems to pose some of the largest ethical issues for cell phones
today. They define malware as being “often disguised as a
game, device patch, utility, or other useful third-party application available
for download … malware can initiate a wide range of attacks and spread itself
onto other devices.” This common and well-known issue among computer users has
not been given as much thought among cell phone users. With the ever-increasing
use of smart phones, people need to realize they have a computer on their phone
now and they too are at risk for malware.
This malware can be a large privacy issue depending on the program it is
running. There may be programs deleting your much-needed files and/or accounts.
They can also prevent the use of the phone at all. Malware of this type
definitely has ethical issues. However, if users continue to not take
responsibility for researching their downloads, they may end up with a virus on
their phone that may eventually spread to other phones and/or computers.
The next security threat out there for cell phones is
eavesdropping. While people are often aware of virus programs coming from some
hacker they don’t know, they should also be wary of companies placing
eavesdropping programs on your phone. As stated in the Guidelines on
Cell Phone and PDA Security,
“Electronic eavesdropping on
phone calls, messages, and other wirelessly transmitted information is possible
through various techniques. Installing spy software on a device to collect and
forward data elsewhere, including conversations captured via a built-in
microphone, is perhaps the most direct means, but other components of a
communications network, including the airwaves, are possible avenues for
exploitation.”
Often times,
companies place these programs in the phones without the users knowledge in
order to track specific information about their customers and claim the
information is used to create solutions to common problems and better serve
their customers. It is becoming even more of an issue with cell phone companies
selling their
user information to police
and law enforcement agencies. This user information can range anywhere from
the basic information to playing back recorded phone calls and showing text
messages that have been sent or received.
While
digital eavesdropping is not exactly illegal, it brings about several ethical
and moral dilemmas. The advancements in technology make it no longer necessary
to come into physical contact with the cell phones in order to place the
eavesdropping device. There are programs that use “… a notebook computer to
impersonate a legitimate access point for a public wireless hot spot, such as a
coffee shop or an airport first-class lounge, [allowing] client connections to
be attracted and sensitive data captured from unsuspected patrons” (Guidelines).
These programs are able to find contact lists, pictures, text messages, bank
information, or anything else that you have on your phone. They are also able
to take a legitimate domain name the user frequents and reroute the user to a
malicious website. The advancements in technology are also allowing people to
use their phones as a method of
payment now since these phones can be connected to bank accounts. This poses a whole new privacy issue
and threat possibility. The ability to track where people shop, how much they
spend, and where their account is linked leads to my next major privacy issue
today of digital eavesdropping; tracking.
Electronic tracking is basically like having a
GPS in your phone at all times. This GPS is a location finder for you though.
It tells others where you are and can track where you have been. Often times
these programs are advertised for parents to keep track of their children and
for business managers to keep track of their employees during office hours (Guidelines).
Some of the programs send a message to the user that requires authentication
while others never inform the user they’re being tracked. It is up to the
parents and business owners to be honest with their trackees. There is an app
now as well that people are downloading which lets them see where their friends
and contacts are (Trackster).
This is a willing app people choose to have and allow others to see them. These
programs are being utilized by law enforcement as well.
These cell phone security issues clearly have
ethical and moral issues within them. The main one being privacy and another
being users not giving consent. Is it ethical to "spy" on someone and listen to their conversations? This is a question that cannot be easily answered. Parents may say that yes it is ok since they are checking on their kids and making sure they are not getting into trouble. Some spouses may say it's all right as well because they are seeing if their spouse is cheating on them. This seems to me to be a large intrusion on privacy and huge lack of trust. We need to get back to talking to each other and discussing issues instead of just assuming and taking drastic measures. Whatever problems were there before I think will only be escalated. These programs are like most other programs out there where they are good programs, but it is the users that make them bad. There are several precautions to take to avoid
these things, but I think that is another blog. The nice thing to think about
is how useful these programs can be. Each of the initial programs began with a
good and positive thought in mind. It was when people modified them and the
wrong people got a hold of them that they were being used for the wrong
purposes.
Other sources used:
It is pretty frightening to see what products are out there now for spying, eavesdropping, etc. and to try and imagine how much more sophisticated the tools the clandestine government agencies have and use. To see that the neat tools that Jack Bauer was using in the television series 24 for listening in on phone calls is out there for the general public to use is disconcerting. Where will the technology advance to next? If Facebook wants you to “Check-in” everywhere you go so your friends can see where you are, what fun “tool” will they add next that further reduces our privacy. Granted the Facebook “check-in” has to be initiated by the user, but still, it’s a little bit intrusive.
ReplyDeleteYour make an excellent point about the technology being created with good intent but it now being used for harm. In the future I feel it will be critical for there to be a collaborative effort with technology companies and possibly even the government to work on some legislation or standards to maximize the benefits of technology but maintain some level of privacy and protection as well.
It is difficult for me to believe that these prorams are already on our phones and that in order to turn it off you hav to actually know it's there. I wonder how many people don't know that it is on their phones?
DeleteGood points. I have used FourSquare on my Droid phone to check in to a lot of places, but I no longer do it while on vacation, because thieves have started monitoring FourSquare to learn when people are out of town and target their homes.
ReplyDeleteScary to think that the days of following people, scoping out houses and digging through trash is no longer necessary to get information on people. Thieves just need a computer and they can do what would normally have taken them days to figure out. Such different precautions to take. We also have programs to send us messages from our home security systems though. Let's see what they come up with next!
DeleteVery scary! I can't tell you how many times a friend of min would say "Hey, I didn't know you were away at Disney?" via text. I would respond "How did you know" and he would say that it came up in the places that I am at when I responded to him via a social network from my iPad. I quickly figured out how do "turn off" "push out" signals, etc. I can see this affecting employees in the workplace too. How many time do we have a staff member call out sick only to find a post online on a social network saying that were somewhere else.
ReplyDeleteTom
"Watching" employees was one of the first uses these programs were created for. It definitely changes the level of productivity and the idea of calling in sick.
DeleteThis is a great post (and mirrors much of what I said in mine). Just as an example, yesterday I agreed to pay a credit card bill of a family member and the credit card company told me I could do so over the phone by giving my checking account number and bank routing number. My exact response was no f***ing way. I am not going to give some unknown person access to my checking account information (and for reasons you mentioned, I require safeguards even before I will use credit card information over the internet). I will not use FourSquare or other identifying geographical information on Facebook or otherwise.
ReplyDeleteI am a hardliner on this subject. I just don't think it is ethical or even legal to eavesdrop on anyone unless (1) there is a reasonable suspicion of physical violence or a major crime being committed, (2) it involves a minor family member or (3) in the case of a school, educators doing so for the sole purpose of protecting the physical or mental health of students. I even think it is inappropriate for spouses to break into their spouse's email account if they suspect adultery. I just think that people are I also refuse to use the internet to pass along gossip or pass along rumors.
The bottom line is that I believe privacy (except in the situations I described in the prior paragraph) is a more important human right than invading it for what others might think are good reasons. And I further believe that our devices should not be armed with such location or other privacy invading apps unless the owner of the device affirmatively elect to activate them.
Nice post! There were a few points that you brought up that hit home with me. One -- consent. There seems to be a generational gap when it comes that ideal. Younger and younger generations have a sense of entitlement and because of how well versed in technology, they show even less regard for it. However, the ethical components of such a practice far outweigh the power.
ReplyDeleteSecond, self-responsibility. Each one of must enforce our own values and ethics in our use of technolgy.
I definitely see consent as being an issue with younger generations. Citing sources is basically obsolete with the internet and the sharing of information. Students don't even have to know MLA or APA at all anymore! They just plug information into a computer program and the program makes their works cited for them! That all is only if they make one though. My students feel they have a right to any information they can find and are quite upset with the blockers placed on the school's server. Completely agree with your statements.
DeleteI think tracking programs have some positive and negative benefits. I know a few friends who would like to be able to track their teenagers, lol. All joking aside, such things might be beneficial for parents of special needs children. Our little one has just bolted out the door on more than a few occasions. Luckily, we got to her quickly. But, I am thinking a chip in a shoe or on clothing might be beneficial at times. I heard a story about one autistic child who liked to climb out his window and go adventuring....
ReplyDeleteOn other side, I never like posting stuff that says I am at a given location. Locally, people posted on Facebook they were going on vacation and their house was robbed. Or, now they want to tell what article or video you viewed. Sadly, we have seen the trouble that hacking into phones and computers can cause, the recent Murdoch or celebrity scandals are evidence of this. I agree with Dan, we all have to take responsibility for ourselves and loved ones in the way we use technology.
This is a very informative post with many personal security points to ponder. The moral and ethical issues associated with electronic device tracking in both our personal and professional lives is interesting to me. I believe the employee relations departments will have their hands full in changing the professional policies that govern electronic use in the workplace. Moreover, the subjectivity among individuals when asking the question who does eavesdropping benefit the most, me or society as a whole, will make for great conversation.
ReplyDeleteI love my GPS features on my phone. Using this GPS, I have setup reminders for when I leave home ("Do you have your wallet?") and when I get to work on Fridays ("Do safety and security walk."). I, along with most others out there, use the mapping software and myriad of apps with the GPS to make our lives more efficient and interactive.
ReplyDeleteBut what about that? I would be disgusted if I found out my phone was actually giving back information, even anonymously, to track where I have been or what I look up. I heard about the iphone tracking:
http://techcrunch.com/2011/04/20/surprise-your-iphone-is-tracking-your-every-move/
http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2011/04/iphone-tracks/
and I decided to disable the log file from even being sent into my computer or Apple, and apparently this was never really used by Apple, but it could have been.
I don't have kids, if I did, I might be interested in placing a tracking app on his/her phone, but I would discuss it with my child first. And together we would decide when to take it off.
I remember my mom telling me about a phone call she got from a friend of hers when I was about 12 or 13. Apparently this friend of hers saw me on my bike about 5 miles from home. My mom's response was not of concern but instead impressed that I had physically developed enough to ride that far. She knew that I had a quarter in my shoe and had memorized a dozen different phone numbers of people I could call if I needed help. She knew I was very good with the layout of my town and while I certainly could have been kidnapped by force, I wasn't going to go willingly into anyones vehicle. It was a trust factor.
Today, I would certainly have had that cell phone, but curious, I called my parents to see if they would have put that app on my phone. Their response was an "Yes, but with your knowledge." When I asked them if I didn't want it, they would still have it on, but the discussion would have changed to why I didn't want it. Interestingly, they said that at 12, as with my trip on my bike scenario, the phone would have it, but at 16, it would have been more my decision.
Now, I was actually the kid who didn't get in trouble, ever... so their decisions would be different then other parents. My sister, well, she would have had the app until she was 18 no matter what... I asked.
Good story ... and I often wonder if we as a nation have forgotten about "trust" when it comes to kids. I have always believed in the 80/20 rule (...you spend 80% of your time dealing with 20% of your _________ (students, patients, customers, etc)). Perhaps we should trust our 80% more.
DeleteI completely agree with you Britt. Trust is definitely a bigger issue now than before. I am always wishing the parents of my students would just talk to their kids before calling their teachers. It makes me a little nervous having this tracking service because it gives another let out for kids and parents NOT to talk to each other. Trust and expectations are both built and established by discussing them in advance. Without this communication who knows what our kids will evolve into. I definitely think if parents will be using this they need to talk to their kids first.
Delete